Fixed prosthesis vs removable prosthesis: indications, benefits and limitations in dental treatment

Abstract

The study aims to comparatively review the restrictions, benefits, and limitations of fixed and removable prostheses in oral rehabilitation, highlighting clinical, functional, and economic criteria that influence the choice of treatment. A literature review was conducted based on the analysis of scientific articles on the subject. The selected studies were examined for success rates, impact on masticatory functionality and quality of life of patients, in addition to factors such as bone support, cost-benefit and adaptation time. Fixed prostheses are indicated for patients with adequate periodontal support, providing greater stability and aesthetics. However, their installation requires preparation of the abutment teeth and can represent a prohibitive cost. Removable prostheses, in turn, are a more affordable and less invasive option, but may present less retention and adaptation over time. The choice between fixed and removable prostheses should consider individual patient factors, including clinical condition, expectations, and economic perspectives. Future studies are needed to evaluate the longevity of these approaches and improve their applications in Rehabilitative Dentistry.